Showing posts with label Baseball Tonight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Baseball Tonight. Show all posts

Thursday, May 14, 2009

The Hard Hitting Analysis of Baseball Tonight

Eduardo Perez delivered a segment discussing the woes of the Seattle Mariners where he mostly just talked about nothing. And he punctuated it with this brilliant insight:
And one thing I can tell you: baserunning, hitting, pitching -- and especially the bullpen -- is not only important in the National and the American League, but all around baseball.

This is the kind of great stuff you can only get from the World Wide Leader in Sports.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

The War of the Baseball Highlight/Analysis Shows Continues

I just tuned in to the midnight version of Baseball Tonight. Guess who stopped by? Why none other than Mr. PECOTA himself, Nate Silver:

I'm guessing this is his "Soon I shall rule the world" face. Anyway, it was pretty neat seeing him. I do not know if he'll be a semi-regular but it seems as though BBTN just went "check" to MLB Tonight. Who will win this war? Who knows? I still think MLB Tonight has a few more pawns left. As long as the bar continues to rise, we should all be happy.

Also, did anyone notice how flustered Buck Showalter seemed when they made note of defensive efficiency? A Harold Reynolds moment, perhaps?

Photo from Minnesota Independent

Monday, March 23, 2009

Buster Olney Doing What He Does


First mistake: I'm watching Baseball Tonight.

Don't ask me why. In any case, during a Spring Training highlight of the Astros and the Marlins, and Karl Ravech makes the off-hand comment that the Nationals rotation looks "formidable this year."

Buster Olney -- a fantastic reporter but an awful analyst, something ESPN is oblivious of -- tops that innocent statement by saying, "no question about it, best rotation in the National League East." A shocked Karl Ravech prodded him on it a few more times through the next several highlights, and Olney just dug in his heels.

Well now. I think there might be a question about that.

So does PECOTA, which puts them at 821 runs allowed, good for last in the division (100 behind the Mets). Sure, that includes fielding, but still. The starters' ERAs range from 4.01 to 5.17 (meh stat, but give me a break). No VORP projected above 30, only one above 20. VORP is kind of lazy, but CHONE gives them about the same sort of performance in Runs Above Replacement, in fact a bit more dire. Though the ERAs are better, I still contend those don't look like the ERAs of a rotation that's unquestionably the best in a division, but who knows, it could happen. PECOTA and CHONE are wrong often. I'm sure Buster Olney doesn't have a history of being made to look stupid by the two systems because of silly, bold predictions.

It seems as though he just gets totally caught up in the story--"the Orioles are going to be really bad; how bad? well look, I'm going to predict they lose 106 games!"--without realizing how silly it is to make such extreme predictions.

Oh. . . my. . .

Well how about this?

I really can't stress enough how funny it is that Olney does worse than just using previous year's record. It's at least closer with the increased sample size--he beat the '06 record by a good deal in '07--but it's still quite pathetic. Here's a guy who probably follows baseball as closely as anyone on the planet, and he isn't adding an ounce of information to least year's records with his predictions. It's kind of incredible, really.


Sooooooo. . . there's kind of a history of this.

You might want to back off of your bold statements of unquestionable facts there, Buster.